Mind the (Spending) Gap: What Does It Mean for Markets?

Personal consumption and income are closely related. That checks out with our economic intuition: For most people, higher wages will translate to higher spending.

The Historical Relationship Between Spending and Income

Historical data also show that spending and income moved in lockstep until 2020, when the pandemic ripped them apart. That’s because COVID-19 lockdowns drastically reduced consumption, while government programs and stimulus contributed to increased pay.

Personal spending relative to income has been relatively stable over time. The graphic below shows just how dramatically that relationship was upset during the pandemic.

The gap left consumers with excess savings and a strong desire to spend. So, it makes sense that once the economy reopened, consumers wanted (and could afford) even more than the economy could produce. That is a direct cause of the recent 40-year high in inflation.

You can see these effects in the excess savings data below. The surge in savings peaked in the wake of the pandemic and has been coming down ever since.

Consumption has been so strong in the post-lockdown era that it has outpaced income—and in the process soaked up roughly $1 trillion of excess pandemic-era savings. Consumers were able to increase purchases even in the face of rapidly rising inflation by using their excess savings. Estimates also suggest that lower-income consumers will use credit cards and other forms of debt to finance spending going forward (negative saving).

As a result, the situation is now reversed from what it was during the pandemic. The huge increase in post-lockdown consumption closed the gap with income and then some, overshooting its historical level of about 89% of income.¹

If history is any indication, this gap could close in the short term—as soon as consumers run out of extra savings.

Rapid Return to Normal Could Spell Trouble for Stocks

One way to close the spending-income gap is for income to increase faster than consumption. If that were to happen, higher wages would argue for lower profit margins for companies going forward. Conversely, if spending were to fall to meet income, then less consumer demand would argue for slowing economic growth and/or declining inflation.

Unfortunately, none of the scenarios are particularly desirable for stocks. Let’s look again at our Spending as a Percentage of Income chart. It shows that consumption would have to fall by about 2% to get back in line with the historical norm since the global financial crisis. The catch is that a drop in spending of that size could trigger a recession.

The adjustment could be even more painful if we return to the relationship between spending and income that held in 2018-19², the years just prior to the pandemic. That would imply a 5% decrease.

On the other hand, if real income (income minus inflation) were to increase, it means that wage growth would have to outpace inflation. Wages running ahead of inflation and economic growth would pressure corporate profit margins.

Both alternatives bode poorly for stocks, as the above-mentioned scenario of lower consumption growth would pressure revenues. Either outcome would reduce real corporate earnings growth, leaving stocks in a vulnerable spot through this economic adjustment.

However it plays out, this relationship bears watching because it has such profound implications for the economy and markets.