My Account
Equity

How U.S. Tariffs Could Impact the Pharmaceutical Industry

Companies are bracing for higher costs and pressured earnings while rethinking their operations.

By  Yusuf Anwar, M.D., CFAErica Kazlow, MBA, Jenny He, Ph.D.
06/17/2025

Key Takeaways

Pharmaceutical companies rely on global supply chains. Tariffs may disrupt their operations, hinder earnings growth and raise consumer prices.

Several pharma companies plan to invest in U.S. production to mitigate tariff risks, though this expansion may take a few years.

Some companies might refrain from taking action, anticipating the tariffs will be lifted after President Trump leaves office.

The U.S. has proposed tariffs on pharmaceuticals that could hit the drugs in your medicine cabinet and the stocks in your portfolio.

President Donald Trump said his administration is considering “major” tariffs on imported pharmaceuticals, which were excluded from his April 2 tariff announcements.

The White House hasn’t detailed the size or scope of the potential tariffs, but Trump suggested they could run anywhere from 50% to 200%.1 Precedent from the auto tariffs could put them closer to 25%.

This would represent a sharp break from recent decades. Thanks to international agreements designed to prevent drug shortages, the pharmaceutical industry has generally faced low or no tariffs. The proposed changes could ratchet up consumer prices and weigh on pharmaceutical firms’ financial results.

While much is still unknown, here are a few things investors should consider.

Why Is the U.S. Considering Pharmaceutical Tariffs?

Many of the world’s largest pharma companies keep their headquarters in the U.S., including eight of the top 20 by revenue.2 Having a U.S. base offers considerable benefits, including:

  • Strong legal protection for drug patents and other intellectual property.

  • Robust access to private investment and public funding.

  • A large market for pharmaceutical sales with fewer price controls than other countries.

Despite these advantages, about 78% of the “solid dosage” medications (e.g., tablets, capsules) sold in the U.S. are produced in other countries.3 For injectable meds, this figure is roughly 55%.

Policymakers worry that high levels of overseas production present a risk to U.S. patients. A massive disruption like a pandemic or war could scramble supply chains and cut off access to life-saving medications.

Drug manufacturing has moved offshore partly because of lower labor and production costs outside the U.S., but tax benefits are also a factor. Companies can often reduce their tax burdens by recognizing more of their profits in countries with lower tax rates.

According to one analysis, the six largest U.S. pharma companies by revenue will pay little or no U.S. corporate income tax for 2024. At the same time, these firms earned billions in domestic and foreign profits.4

Will Pharma Tariffs Increase Medication Costs?

Higher tariffs could mean higher prices for some of the most used medications in the U.S.

Generic or biosimilar drugs comprise roughly 90% of prescription medicines in the country.5 They lack patent protection and cost less than brand-name medications, which benefits consumers.

However, generics and biosimilars also face more exposure to tariffs because they’re made mostly outside the U.S. Other countries produce about 88% of the active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) used in generics taken by U.S. patients.6 (APIs are the molecules that give drugs their intended effects.)

These medications also tend to have thinner profit margins. As a result, generic drug makers may be less able to absorb the cost of higher tariffs. The Association for Accessible Medicines, a trade group for generics, said tariffs would “significantly increase” prices.7

Higher tariffs might also affect pharma companies that make branded or “on-patent” medications. Even if they can absorb tariff costs, doing so could pressure their margins.

How Drugmakers May Adapt to U.S. Tariffs

We believe that pharma companies could implement several measures in response to tariffs.

1. Expand U.S.-Based Drug Manufacturing

Pharma firms might try to moderate or prevent tariff costs by onshoring production in the U.S. Several companies have recently announced billion-dollar expansions.

Figure 1 | Pharma Firms Eye Manufacturing, R&D Investments

Company

Estimated Commitment

Purpose

Johnson & Johnson8

>$55 billion

Four new manufacturing facilities, increased research & development (R&D) and tech investments.

Roche9

$50 billion

New facilities, expansion and upgrades at existing sites.

Eli Lilly10

$27 billion — total spend of $50 billion since 2020

Four new manufacturing sites focused on APIs, injectables.

Novartis11

$23 billion

Seven new manufacturing and R&D sites, plus expansion at three existing manufacturing facilities.

AbbVie12

$10 billion

Four new plants.

Merck13

$8 billion — total spend of $20 billion since 2018

Manufacturing and R&D capabilities.

Amgen14

$900 million

Expansion of its Ohio manufacturing facility.

In early May, Trump signed an executive order designed to speed up new domestic pharma manufacturing.15 The order directs federal agencies to streamline reviews and offer other help to companies that are bringing new factories online.

Some companies might also be able to tap into unused production capacity at their existing U.S. plants. A 2022 survey from Washington University found that U.S.-based makers of generic drugs operated at roughly half their maximum capacity.16

However, obstacles stand in the way of rapidly onshoring pharmaceutical manufacturing.

  • It takes time to set up new plants and expand capacity in existing ones. Companies may encounter technological and regulatory challenges if they choose this option.

  • Certain APIs are only produced in other countries, forcing the U.S. to import those essential ingredients.

Pharmaceutical companies may be making a tradeoff by onshoring drug manufacturing in the U.S. While doing so might reduce their exposures to tariffs, they would pay higher U.S. production costs in exchange.

2. Reshore Pharmaceutical IP

U.S. pharmaceutical companies have transferred ownership of their patents to a subsidiary or similar entity in another country for years.

This foreign subsidiary charges other subsidiaries fees for using the patent, enabling them to benefit from the lower corporate income tax rates in the country where the patent is held.

Tariffs may encourage these companies to return their patents and other intellectual property (IP), along with the associated revenues, to the U.S. Even if doing so increases their tax burdens, higher corporate taxes might cost less than tariffs.

Bringing IP to the U.S. might become more attractive if the country shrinks its corporate income tax rate. During his re-election campaign, Trump proposed cutting the corporate rate from 21% to 15%.

3. Cut Back on R&D

Some companies may be unwilling or unable to increase drug manufacturing in the U.S. For example, price caps in various countries could prevent them from raising prices.

Instead, the firms may end up absorbing the cost of higher tariffs, at least partially. To make up for this, these firms could spend less on R&D, even if that slows the creation of new and better medications.

4. Take No Action

Finally, companies might avoid sweeping operational changes, especially if any tariffs end after Trump’s term.

Doing nothing could also make sense if other countries introduce countermeasures to U.S. tariffs.

A coalition of pharma companies is lobbying the European Union for “rapid, radical” changes, including streamlined drug reviews and more generous IP protections.17 Otherwise, the companies said that the EU runs the risk that billions in R&D and manufacturing will migrate to the U.S.

Companies could take other steps to mitigate tariff costs, allowing them to defer changes to their operations. For example, they could use transfer pricing to allocate more of their goods’ costs to the U.S. portion of their supply chain. The value of their imported goods would decline, reducing the size of any U.S. tariffs.

What’s Next for U.S. Pharma Tariffs?

The exact impact of any pharmaceutical tariffs will be hard to assess until the Trump administration releases its plans. Because there are so many moving parts, we continue monitoring government policy developments and companies’ responses.

However, we think pharma firms could experience higher costs and impaired earnings.

Authors
Yusuf Anwar, M.D., CFA
Yusuf Anwar, M.D., CFA

Portfolio Manager

Erica Kazlow, MBA.
Erica Kazlow, MBA

Senior Investment Analyst

Jenny He, Ph.D.

Investment Research Analyst

U.S. Growth

Explore How Our Growth Teams Explore Opportunities in Today’s Markets

1

Nathaniel Weixel, “Trump pharma tariff threat raises specter of shortages, price hikes,” The Hill, April 14, 2025.

2

Kevin Dunleavy, “The top 20 pharma companies by 2024 revenue,” Fierce Pharma, April 21, 2025.

3

Vimala Raghavendran and Erkan Duman, “India and the United States manufacture most finished medicines for the U.S. market,” USP, February 19, 2025.

4

Brad W. Setser, “American Pharmaceutical Companies Still Aren’t Paying Tax in the U.S.,” Council on Foreign Relations, March 14, 2025.

5

Vimala Raghavendran, Praewpaka Drucker, and Erkan Duman, “Over half of the active pharmaceutical ingredients (API) for prescription medicines in the U.S. come from India and the European Union,” USP, April 17, 2025.

6

Vimala Raghavendran, Praewpaka Drucker, and Erkan Duman, “Over half of the active pharmaceutical ingredients (API) for prescription medicines in the U.S. come from India and the European Union,” USP, April 17, 2025.

7

Association for Accessible Medicines, “Tariff Actions Should Ensure Access to Lower-Cost Generic and Biosimilar Medicines,” April 14, 2025.

8

Johnson & Johnson, “Johnson & Johnson Increases U.S. Investment to More than $55 billion Over the Next Four Years,” Press Release, March 21, 2025.

9

Roche, “Roche to invest USD 50 billion in pharmaceuticals and diagnostics in the United States over the next five years,” Media Release, April 21, 2025.

10

Eli Lilly, “Lilly plans to more than double U.S. manufacturing investment since 2020, exceeding $50 billion,” Press Release, February 26, 2025.

11

Novartis, “Novartis plans to expand its US-based manufacturing and R&D footprint with a total investment of $23B over the next 5 years,” Press Release, April 10, 2025.

12

Jared S. Hopkins, “Drugmaker AbbVie Ramps Up Domestic Manufacturing Plans on Tariff Threats,” Wall Street Journal, April 25, 2025.

13

Merck, “Merck Unveils New Facility to Increase Vaccine Production Capacity,” News Release, March 11, 2025.

14

Amgen, “Amgen Announces $900 Million Manufacturing Expansion, Creation of 350 New Jobs in Ohio,” Press Release, April 25, 2025.

15

The White House, “Fact Sheet: President Donald J. Trump Announces Actions to Reduce Regulatory Barriers to Domestic Pharmaceutical Manufacturing,” May 5, 2025.

16

Anthony Sardella, “U.S. Generic Pharmaceutical Manufacturer Available Capacity Research Survey,” Center for Analytics and Business Insights, Olin Business School at Washington University, September 30, 2022.

17

European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations, “Pharma CEOs alert President von der Leyen to risk of exodus to the US,” Press Release, April 8, 2025.

The opinions expressed are those of American Century Investments (or the portfolio manager) and are no guarantee of the future performance of any American Century Investments' portfolio. This material has been prepared for educational purposes only. It is not intended to provide, and should not be relied upon for, investment, accounting, legal or tax advice.

References to specific securities are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended as recommendations to purchase or sell securities. Opinions and estimates offered constitute our judgment and, along with other portfolio data, are subject to change without notice.

Investment return and principal value of security investments will fluctuate. The value at the time of redemption may be more or less than the original cost. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Mutual Funds: American Century Investment Services, Inc., Distributor.

Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs): Foreside Fund Services, LLC - Distributor, not affiliated with American Century Investment Services, Inc.