My Account

2026 Multi-Asset Strategies Outlook

Fourth Quarter

Multi-colored piles of spices.

Key Takeaways

  1. Fiscal dominance can restrict the Federal Reserve’s (Fed’s) flexibility because debt, inflationary pressures and interest costs may force fiscal and monetary policies in different directions.

  2. Heavy federal debt may complicate inflation control by increasing pressure to keep borrowing costs manageable.

How Could Fiscal Dominance Constrain Monetary Policy?

The U.S. debt, which has doubled over the past 10 years, has reached $40 trillion. That’s about $117,000 in debt per person in the U.S. Roughly $1 in every $5 in federal tax revenue now goes toward interest payments on the debt.1

These conditions raise concerns about “fiscal dominance” — a situation in which high government debt and persistent deficits constrain the Fed’s monetary policy. A growing debt burden may increase pressure on the Fed to keep interest rates low because higher rates raise the government’s borrowing costs. That pressure could conflict with the Fed’s mandate to control inflation.

Furthermore, the U.S. Treasury wants to issue fewer long-maturity bonds, which carry higher coupon rates, and instead issue more short-term debt. But if the Fed needs to push short-term rates higher to curb inflation, the government would soon have to pay higher rates on a larger volume of maturing short-term debt. Minutes from the latest Fed meeting show a deep split among Fed governors over whether to hike rates.

This puts Fed Chair Kevin Warsh and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent at odds. Although the two reportedly meet often, the situation underscores why the Fed is designed to operate independently: It must pursue its economic mandates rather than lower rates primarily to reduce the government’s borrowing costs.

What Does Persistent Inflation Mean for Markets?

After decades of low inflation and declining interest rates, COVID-era supply shocks and stimulus payments made inflation a key issue again for equity and bond investors.

While inflation is lower now than in 2022, high energy prices and trade barriers have kept the Fed’s 2% target out of reach. Rising prices are weighing on consumers, and markets are questioning whether the Fed is willing to “do whatever it takes” (borrowing a phrase from former European Central Bank (ECB) head Mario Draghi) to bring inflation back to 2%.

In this environment, developments typically seen as positive can have negative market implications. Signs of economic growth may fuel inflation fears, increasing the likelihood that the Fed will hike interest rates. Higher rates could weigh on stocks by increasing borrowing costs and reducing the present value of future earnings.

While artificial intelligence (AI) is likely to boost productivity significantly over the medium- to long-term, today’s massive AI-related spending is increasing demand — and potentially prices — for consumer electronics, gas turbines and generators, and construction labor. Conversely, weak gross domestic product (GDP) growth, higher unemployment or both could give the Fed more latitude to hold or even cut rates, potentially benefiting stocks. In other words, economic news can affect markets in counterintuitive ways.

Key point: Interest rates depend on more than inflation, but inflation is currently in the driver’s seat.

Inflation data has become less reliable because fewer companies are responding to government surveys and calls. The Fed chair has formed a committee to explore potential improvements. Its work will be important because policymakers and markets rely heavily on accurate inflation data.

Could Fiscal Dominance Create New Market Risks?

The relationship between bond yields and stock returns has shifted over time. They are now mostly negatively correlated.

Over the past 40-plus years, this theoretically “normal” pattern hasn’t always held. During the zero interest-rate policy (ZIRP) era of 2008–2015, stock prices and bond yields were far more likely to move in tandem.

Over the past 12 months, however, they have generally moved in opposite directions: When bond yields have declined, the U.S. stock market has moved higher, and vice versa. One possible explanation is that higher inflation expectations have affected both markets.

How Could Yield Curve Control Affect the U.S. Dollar?

In June and July, the Japanese yen fell to a 40-year low, increasing the likelihood that Japan would intervene to strengthen its currency. Why does this matter? Because such interventions typically involve selling U.S. Treasury holdings to raise dollars to buy yen. Japan is the largest foreign holder of U.S. Treasuries. Selling some would increase the supply of Treasuries, lowering prices and pushing yields higher. Bessent proposed other ways to boost the yen so that Japan could avoid doing that.

Bessent took a small but symbolically significant step to curb the recent rise in long-maturity bond yields by implementing “yield curve control” (YCC) — purchasing long-term bonds to lower their yields. To be clear, the volumes involved were modest, and the Treasury’s ability to influence the yield curve remains limited.

Long-term yields dipped, but the underlying forces haven’t changed. Reflecting the previously noted negative correlation between bond yields and stock prices, the equity market moved higher, though only slightly. Given AI’s influence on the S&P 500® Index, it’s hard to pinpoint exactly what was going on. However, the YCC action significantly affected the dollar, which posted its worst day in months.

Some market watchers say the dollar’s decline reflects skepticism about efforts to artificially suppress the premium investors demand for holding long-term government bonds. They argue that such efforts may signal an unwillingness to address rising debt and the large federal deficit, potentially adding pressure on the dollar. They also appear at odds with Warsh’s preference for markets to do some of the Fed’s work by allowing rates to rise “organically.”

Further attempts at YCC would likely weaken the dollar, pushing inflation higher by raising import costs. That would increase pressure on the Fed, which already faces questions about its independence. Of course, another solution would be to reduce the deficit, but unless Congress is willing to raise taxes, that’s unlikely to happen any time soon.

Gold prices offered another indication of investor unease about YCC. After recently retreating from a multiyear rise, gold recorded its strongest one-day gain in six months following the Treasury’s bond purchases. The move may suggest that some investors viewed the intervention as a risk to the dollar or as a potential source of additional inflationary pressure.

Watching the Dollar, Debt and Interest Rates

The phrase "exorbitant privilege" refers to the economic advantage the U.S. enjoys because the dollar serves as the world's primary reserve currency. Coined in the 1960s by France’s finance minister, the term describes how global demand for dollars allows the U.S. to borrow at relatively low costs, run persistent trade deficits and finance budget shortfalls more easily. Critics argue that this advantage has reduced the urgency to address the nation’s growing debt burden.

U.S. debt of $40 trillion and questions about the country’s reliability as an ally and trading partner have fueled debate about whether this exorbitant privilege is gradually eroding. These concerns could lead foreign governments to diversify their holdings into other currencies, such as the yuan or euro, or assets such as gold.

Higher long-term interest rates, or anything else that could prompt investors to sell Treasury bonds, would require the U.S. to pay much higher interest on its debt. Regardless of whether stock and bond prices are positively or negatively correlated, that would hurt investors.

None of this discussion should be interpreted as a lack of confidence in the U.S. economy’s resilience. However, because interest rates, economic growth and stock prices are interrelated, it’s important to consider these factors while recognizing that their effects are difficult to predict.

—

¹Dan Ready, “CBO Releases Infographics About the Federal Budget in Fiscal Year 2025,” Congressional Budget Office Blog, March 30, 2026.

Rich Weiss
Richard Weiss

Senior Vice President, Senior Portfolio Manager

Chief Investment Officer, Multi-Asset Strategies

Inflation in Focus

Get market updates, behavioral insights and investment ideas.

©2026 Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC. The S&P 500® Index is composed of 500 selected common stocks most of which are listed on the New York Stock Exchange. It is not an investment product available for purchase.

References to specific securities are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended as recommendations to purchase or sell securities. Opinions and estimates offered constitute our judgment and, along with other portfolio data, are subject to change without notice.

International investing involves special risks, such as political instability and currency fluctuations. Investing in emerging markets may accentuate these risks.

Investment return and principal value of security investments will fluctuate. The value at the time of redemption may be more or less than the original cost. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Historically, small- and/or mid-cap stocks have been more volatile than the stock of larger, more-established companies. Smaller companies may have limited resources, product lines and markets, and their securities may trade less frequently and in more limited volumes than the securities of larger companies.

The letter ratings indicate the credit worthiness of the underlying bonds in the portfolio and generally range from AAA (highest) to D (lowest).

Diversification does not assure a profit nor does it protect against loss of principal.

Rebalancing allows you to keep your asset allocation in line with your goals. It does not guarantee investment returns and does not eliminate risk.

Generally, as interest rates rise, bond prices fall. The opposite is true when interest rates decline.

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Investment returns will fluctuate and it is possible to lose money.

The opinions expressed are those of American Century Investments (or the portfolio manager) and are no guarantee of the future performance of any American Century Investments portfolio. This material has been prepared for educational purposes only. It is not intended to provide, and should not be relied upon for, investment, accounting, legal or tax advice.